Friday, December 14, 2012

Final Reflective Essay: Intercultural Communication


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final Reflective Essay

Donna Crawford

COM-40164

December 13,2012

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                   

 

            Discrimination can occur in all aspects of life and can vary in form. Discrimination can be divided into two main, but not mutually exclusive types, depending on how it is expressed, by whom, and against whom (Karlsen & Nazroo. 2012). Interpersonal discrimination can usually be directly perceived as discriminatory interactions between individuals (Karlsen & Nazroo, 2012). Institutional discrimination tends to be more invisible than interpersonal discrimination because it typically refers to discrimination practices or practices embedded in organizational structures (Karlsen & Nazroo. 2012).

            Forms of interpersonal discrimination can occur between individuals who may encounter religious intolerance, sexual discrimination, deep racial barriers and other forms of prejudices that cause stress in these interactions and communication with others (Eisenberg & Goodall, 1997). Prejudice and interpersonal discrimination can sometimes be based on personal characteristics such as names, physical appearance, and/or skin color (Martin & Nakayama. 2011). Martin and Nakayama (2010) give an example of this type of discrimination with Muslim American women reporting discrimination based on their wearing of head coverings, which was a historical expression of their belief in the importance of modesty. Another offered example was one of a Black Harvard MBA graduate who had to go through an interview with the person he would be reporting to. This person bluntly told him he did not trust Black people (Martin & Nakayama, 2011).

            “There are fewer cases of such blatant discrimination in the workplace, and yet it still exists (Martin & Nakayama, 2011. pg. 325).” This type of discrimination is referred to as Institutional Discrimination. ”Institutional discrimination is built into the structure itself and it can occur regardless of the desires or intentions of the people perpetuating it (Freeman, 2012. Pg. 1). Freeman (2012) claims that institutional discrimination begins with the recruitment process and that most of the better jobs are not openly advertised. Knowledge of better job opportunities is often limited to friends and colleagues of those in power in the institution and rarely gets to members of other groups. Once applicants have been found, the actual criteria upon which selections are made are based on one’s compatibility to “institutional image” and general ability to “fit in” (Freeman, 2012). This idea is validated by Martin’s and Nakayama’s (2011) suggestion of how criteria of advancement are more subjective and can depend more on who you know, than on your specific job skills.

\           Discrimination continues to occur in today’s society and in many cases is influenced by popular culture. Popular culture not only confirms our worldviews, but also reinforces our sense of who we are. Popular culture images can reinforce stereotypes that influence interpersonal and professional relationships. This influence can affect the individual’s self-image as well as other’s perception of a particular image of a cultural group or individual (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). Many times pop culture can minimize our self-concept by portraying stereotypical images that lessen our self-worth. This concept also influences those that are in decision-making positions. When the media reports biased images and portrayals of certain groups, decision-makers and many members of society conform to biased images, which limit hope and opportunities for equality. By conforming to these images of popular culture, individuals place limitations upon themselves in addition to societal limitations that exist from previous beliefs and expectations. These beliefs and expectations must be understood and changed through the concept of the acceptance of cultural differences and the potential innovation and creativity that diversity can offer.

            If innovation and creativity of diversity is not accepted, conflict can occur among members of organizations and teams because people pursue different interests (Eisenberg & Goodall, 2011). “In organizations, most conflict arises from the acquisitions and use of resources (Eisenberg & Goodall, 2011).”Cultural differences in team member communication are of more concern in today’s response to global competition. Negotiations is a key to managing intercultural differences and the style and amount of time devoted and its relative impact differ across cultures. Eisenber and Goodall, (2011) offer four phases in the negotiation process that occur in all cultures along with the differences that occur between some of them:

            1) Developing relationships with others. It is wise to avoid insensitive remarks and to express tolerance of other’s goals and values as well as to respect what others enjoy in their natural culture (Eisenberg & Goodall, 2011),

            2) Exchanging information about topics under negotiations. This is a way to generate trust as well as a strategic means to access information and to clarify ideas (Eisenberg & Goodall, 2011).

            3) Recognize multicultural techniques of persuasion. “It is recommended that teams focus more on gaining information than on persuading and that team members respect their cultural differences when persuasion is necessary (Eisenberg & Goodall, 2010, pg. 226).”

            4) Emphasizing the role of concession in achieving agreement. “…..A contract is considered binding in American culture, but in most Asian cultures, a contract may be superseded by informal relationships…(Eisenberg & Goodall, 2011, pg 326).

            The differences in balance and inquiry of intercultural communication is based on a dependency of educating oneself to become a global citizen by profiting from interactions with others who are different (Matin & Nikayama, 2011). Whether you are interacting within a professional, educational, or social environment, it is important to recognize that there are many different cultural beliefs, values, and identities interacting between a sender and a receiver of communication. In order to better communicate multiple identities, you should be mindful or conscious, about your responses. It is important to note how your own privilege might influence the responses you have to others. It is important to be proactive when you communicate with others by taking the initiative to create positive changes (Eisenberg, & Goodall, 2011). Finally, it is important to utilize effective listening and critical thinking skills, which can build potential skills for bridging differences at work and in life (Eisenberg & Goodall. 2011).

            One of the main barriers of cultural differences is language. We deal with this everyday in the political, educational, and business context. I believe it is possible for two people, or even two nations to communicate effectively if they don’t speak the same language. We have been doing this for years. Be it by gestures, interpreters, or nonverbal communication, we can speak the same language as long as we have the knowledge and understanding of each others’ cultural views. If we truly understand the culture and interpersonal meanings of who we are communicating with, we can come to an understanding of each other’s wants and desires. This can result in a win-win situation, which is what all of us want to achieve.

 

 

 

 

References

Eisenberg, E.M., Goodall, H.L.( 1997). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity

            And constraint. (2nd ed). Bedford/St. Martin’s.: Boston, NY

Eisenber, E.M., Goodall, H.L. (2011).  Organizaiona communication: Balancing creativity and                 constraint. (6th ed). Bedford, St. Martin’s. : Boston, NY

Freeman, J. Institutional Discrimination. Retrieved from:


Karlsen, S., Nazroo, J. Relation between racial discrimination, social class, and health among                   ethnic minority groups. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pmc/articles

Martin, J. Nakayama, T. (2011). Experiencing intercultural communication: An introduction. (4th ed).

                New York, NY.: McGraw-Hill.

 

           

           

           

            2)

             

             

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Gran Torino Analysis


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gran Torino Film Analysis

Donna Crawford

COM-40164

December 1, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

            In the movie Gran Torino, there are a number of identifiable cultural conflicts. One of the most obvious is during the scene where Walt was invited to his neighbor’s house for a dinner. While walking through the house with Sue, he asked her why all of “her” people looked to the floor when he made eye contact with them. He then placed his hand affectionately on top of a young girl’s head as she walked by and all of the family members became silent and showed signs of dismay. Sue explained to Walt about some differences in her family’s traditions and culture, which resulted in the reactions from her family members. She explained that in her culture it is the belief that the soul resides on the head so it is inappropriate to touch anyone’s head, be it young or old. She also explained that in her culture, direct eye contact is considered rude. Walt’s expectations, values, and processes were perceived as incompatible with those of his neighbor’s (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). Walt’s verbally direct approach for dealing with disagreements and his absence of emotion reflects the discussion style of intercultural conflict (Martin & Nakayama, 2011).

            There were a number of social conflicts identified in the movie Gran Torino. Martin and Nakayama (2011) define social conflict as “…unequal or unjust social relationships between social groups…(pg. 238).” The gang-related social conflicts included the Chinese gang conflicting with the Mexican gang. This conflict t resulted when the Mexican gang was tormenting Thao and Thao’s cousin’s gang, which was Chinese, came to his defense. They came to Thao’s defense because they were Chinese and wanted dominance and power over the Mexican gang. Another demonstration of social conflict was when the three African American teenagers began to harass Sue and her White boyfriend. Her boyfriend tried to act like, or fit in with the Black teenager’s behavioral style. This was offensive to the young men and caused the conflict to escalate.

            An example of pop culture demonstrated in the film was the rap music being played in the scenes with the confrontation between the Chinese and Mexican gangs. Rap music is often identified with gang activity. The lyrics often express violence and domination of a group. Rap music was also present in the basement of Thao’s house when the younger generation was socializing. This was not a violent scene but it represented the young culture’s way of socializing. Another example of pop culture was Walt’s symbols of patriotism. He had the American flag waving from his porch. The barber shop and the bar also displayed patriotic symbols such as American flags and other American pictures and symbols. These types of pop culture influence the way individuals behave in different settings and they define the expected culture of the location.

            The conclusion of the film was a desperate act of Walt saving his neighbors, but it was also an act of anger and revenge. The arrest of the gang members may have resolved the violence temporarily, but other gangs will replace them unless the community unites as a force that will not tolerate gangs in their community. This can be a difficult process because the community is populated by individuals that mostly have collectivist values that significantly affect the communication styles of conflict management (Rothwell, 2012).

            Collectivists are high-context cultures that favor avoiding or accommodating styles of conflict management (Rothwell, 2012). This style of communication would be inappropriate for this situation because of its complexity. I believe it would be appropriate to use the priest as an intermediary to organize the community and to promote cooperative communication within the group in order to develop a cooperative atmosphere of perceived similarity, trust, flexibility, and open communication (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). The key here is to establish an atmosphere among the community that allows them to interact with each other in a cooperative manner which builds on their values and beliefs. This collaboration can provide their community with the perception of a strong allegiance that will detour a gang’s desire to reside in their neighborhood.

            My feeling about the movie is that it depicted characters, behaviors, and beliefs that many of us are familiar with. Most of us know somebody who is similar to the main character, Walt. He is the older, White man who is very patriotic and who holds prejudices towards cultures other than his own. He has s distant and hardened relationship with his sons and grandchildren, but develops a certain closeness with his neighbor’s children. I appreciated how the movie showed the dislike between Walt and the neighbor’s grandmother, but also showed an agreement between them when Thao helped the woman across the street. The simple nod to each other represented respect in Thao’s behavior. The nod showed similar values and beliefs between two people who were very different and who disliked each other. I also liked how the neighborhood showed honor and respect towards Walt when he protected Thao from the gang. He received gifts of appreciation and nobility from the community while his own family was trying to convince him to move to a retirement community because they felt he was not capable of caring for himself.

            The rape and assault of Sue was difficult to watch and I blamed Walt for this event. He retaliated and beat up a gang member for tormenting Thao, which escalated the anger of the gang. This happens in reality today because hatred leads to revenge and more violence. Walt’s extreme actions of revenge and the community’s extreme act of avoidance had no chance in creating harmony.

            The character that best represents me in terms of my views and perspectives is Sue. She recognized cultural differences and rather than avoid or ignore them, she acknowledged them openly. She did not get offended by Walt’s racial slurs and she respected his differences. When Walt asked about certain reactions from her family, she explained the traditions and cultures openly. I feel it is respectful to acknowledge and inquire about another person’s differences. This shows your interest in them. To avoid and ignore differences leads to misunderstandings and interpersonal conflict. Openly discussing cultural differences leads to an understanding and respect of different communication styles and conflict resolutions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Martin, J. Nakayama, T. (2011). Experiencing intercultural communication: An introduction. (4th ed).

                New York, NY.: McGraw-Hill.

Rothwell, D.J. (2012). In mixed company: Communicating in small groups and teams. (8th ed).

                Boston, MA.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

 

 

 

           

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Nonverbal Messages


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonverbal Messages

Donna Crawford

COM-40164

November 24, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

            This reflection essay about an interpersonal situation in which I misread and misinterpreted someone’s nonverbal message involved me, my girlfriend, and a friend of hers. My friend and her friend are both from Mexico. I explained my assignment and asked her what cultural label she preferred to be referenced as. She responded that she preferred Mexican to Mexican-American or Latino, so Mexican will be the label I will use throughout this assignment.

            My friend invited me to go with her to see a friend of hers who she needed to speak with. Her friend lived in a neighborhood that was mostly populated with Mexican residents; some legal, some not. Most of them did not speak English and I spoke a little Spanish, but formal Spanish that was taught in high school. Mexican is very different than formal Spanish. This should have been the first clue that I was going to be interacting with a culture that was very different from the Spanish culture I had studied and from the interpersonal relationship I had with my friend.

            When we arrived at the residence of the friend (a Mexican man in his late 40s) he came outdoors and greeted my friend with a hug and a kiss on the cheek. She stood between him and me and did not introduce me. I thought this was rude and out of character for my friend, so I slightly nudged her to introduce me. I could tell she was resistant and I could not understand their conversation. I cleared my throat to signal her again and she gave me a look as if to say “ok, you asked for it.” She introduced him to me first and then me to him. I am a very outgoing and friendly person, so I made eye contact, gave a friendly smile and a handshake. He then grabbed me with a full body hug and a kiss on the mouth, along with other nonverbal body language that was very uncomfortable to me. My friend spoke Mexican to him and broke us apart. She remained between us until we left and she hurried me to the car.

            When we began to drive off, I asked my friend about what happened. After she finished laughing, she explained some of the Mexican man’s cultural background and beliefs. She explained that in Mexico, a man of his age interprets a big smile, prolonged eye contact, and the extension of the hand from a woman is considered as a sexual advancement. He thought I was sexually interested in him and he responded in the same manner by his body language towards me.

            This incident validated how crucial nonverbal messages can be. There was no verbal communication between me and the man, but my nonverbal message to him was misinterpreted because of our cultural norms being very different. I wanted to express friendliness and he perceived seduction. All of this occurred within seconds and without verbal communication. Nonverbal communication can enhance verbal communication or it can be its own message. It is critical that there is a cultural understanding between the sender and the receiver in order for nonverbal messages to be understood and effective.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Identity Reflection


 

 

 

 

 

 

Identity Reflection

Donna Crawford

COM-40164

November 17, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            Certain situations that I have experienced have made me conscious of two particular identities. One of these identities is that of a single White mother of a biracial (Black and White) seventeen year old son (Cameron). I was actually a single mother to him since he was six, but as he has grown older and has experienced an identity crisis, I have become more conscious of how my role as his White mother affects him. The other identity that I became conscious of, over twenty years ago is that of a woman business owner. Situations such as applying for business loans, the struggle to be recognized as an educated business owner, and gaining the respect and trust of potential customers have made me conscious of this identity.

            Cameron’s biracial experience was similar to one of the student’s (Maureen’s) experience described by Martin and Nakayama (2011). I am White and Cameron’s father is African American. Cameron attends a mostly White school with many Hispanics and only a few other Black students. The grouping of these students left Cameron feeling confused and depressed because none of the groups accepted him. Cameron felt as though he had to choose to be Black or White, and he chose Black. Once he made this decision, he hid the fact that he had a White mother and he did not want me to attend his events, baseball games, or school activities for fear his new Black friends would realize he had a White mother. This was devastating to me at first. Cameron is now in the stage of self-acceptance and assertion. He is finding a more secure sense of self. Similar to what Martin and Nakayama (2011) explain; he is beginning to embrace both parent’s racial groups and now claims to be “mixed.” Cameron’s identity struggle made me aware that my identity of being his White mother was different than being a mother of a monoracial child. I am now playing an important role in helping develop a healthy biracial identity by providing supportive communication that encourages him to embrace both racial backgrounds (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). I am also more aware that I can help him cope with prejudice and discrimination by giving the correct advice when he faces these situations.

            My identity as a women business owner has changed over my 22 years of operation. Even though today in the United States women find a much wider range of business opportunities, a few decades ago men tended to hold most of the positions of authority and women were expected to play a more subservient role (Thill & Bovee, 2009). Thill and Bovee (2009) provide evidence that men and women tend to have slightly different communication styles, which was recognized when I attempted to express my needs and expectations as a business owner. Whether it was applying for a business loan, negotiating commercial property, or presenting my business plan, I faced many struggles partly because all of my receivers were men and societal norms were not yet on the woman-ownership side. Once I established ownership, it was difficult for my customers to separate my identity of the owner of a dance company from “Ms. Donna” the dance instructor. Many of my customers are still surprised to discover that I am the owner of the company. It is as if they expect Art Linkletter (owner of Art Linkletter Dance Studios, Inc.) to walk in.

            There are both advantages and disadvantages of having these two identities. I feel that the personal advantage is the awareness of the differences in how I perceive myself compared to how others perceive me. Since I have recognized my identity as a mother of a biracial child, I have become more aware of how one can be rejected from groups and how I unknowingly benefitted from the advantage of race privilege. Eisenberg, Goodall, and Tretheway (2010) provide examples of White privileges, such as being rarely asked to speak for the entire race and seeing people who look like me most places I go. My son does not have these privileges. The disadvantage of this identity is not fully knowing how my son or other biracial people feel. I can sympathize and try to understand, but since I am not directly affected, I cannot know how it truly feels.

            The advantage of my woman business owner identity is the development of perseverance and commitment to overcome many barriers. This has made me determined to continuously educate myself in the field of communication. Effective business management will not prosper a company without effective communication skills. I can be “Ms. Donna” and ASDP, LLC. at the same time and work the two identities so they relate to both my students and to my associates as long as I can effectively communicate in both contexts.

            My identities influence the way I communicate with others by having an understanding of differences and perceptions among people. It is easy to communicate with others that have similar identities because you share many of the same beliefs and values. When communicating with people from other identities, I listen more than I speak. By this, I mean it is important to listen to others and to ask questions to avoid misunderstandings. This requires you to develop interpersonal communication skills in order to empathize and understand where the differences developed and how they feel about things. I have learned not to make assumptions and not to ignore the differences. By communicating in this way, we can learn from each other and become more innovative and creative.

            The identities I have written about may exclude me from certain groups or cause others to reject me, but they are interrelated with other identities that make me who I am. In certain situations, I have learned to analyze the circumstances before I act or react. I do not take it personal when others who are not part of my identities disagree or choose not to interact with me because I respect their feelings and I realize that not everybody is educated about culture and identity differences. If they are willing to try to understand why I feel as I do, I try to inform them because recognizing and questioning someone about their differences demonstrates the desire to learn and understand one another.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Eisenberg, E., Goodall, H., Trethewey, A. (2010). Organizational communication:

            Balancing creativity and constraint. (6th ed.). Boston, NY. Bedford/St. Martin’s.

 Martin, J. Nakayama, T. (2011). Experiencing intercultural communication: An introduction. (4th ed).

                New York, NY.: McGraw-Hill.

Thill, J., Bovee, C. (2009). Excellence in business communication. (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ.:

                Prentice Hall.

 

           

 

 

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Historical Examination


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical Examination

Donna Crawford

COM-40164

November 7, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.  Why would it be important to examine the role of history in Intercultural Communication?

            Our culture is strongly influenced by the history that we know and our feelings about that history (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). The various histories that involve politics, intellect, social settings, families, nationality, and cultural groups intertwine with our various identities based on gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, race, and so on (Martin & Nakayama, 2008). Our history helps us understand who we are and why others interact with us as they do as well as our perception of others. Examining the role of history in Intercultural Communication (IC) gives us an understanding of others, which can help break down communication barriers. What one culture feels is an important part of their history and identity, we may not be aware of or we may have a completely different idea about it. By examining the role of history in IC, we can become more sensitive, empathetic, and understanding of each others’ differences.

            A personal experience in which relates to the importance of understanding the history of certain identities is one from my former marriage. My former mother-in-law and her mother (Grandma) are African American. Grandma was a servant to a White man in Virginia. She was raped and became pregnant from him and my mother-in-law was a product of this atrocity. She was resistant to accepting me (a White woman) into her family because of the racial problems we might face. I made the ignorant statement of how interracial couples and children are accepted in today’s society and she should get over the past. I was not aware of her history at the time of this statement. Once I understood her family history, I was able to understand her resistance along with other feelings towards “the White man”.

 

2.  What are hidden histories and how might hidden histories affect intercultural interactions?

            Cultural group histories are histories of cultural groups within a nation that has its own history. Even though many of these histories are hidden, they help us understand the identity of the group (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). Hidden histories are not typically included in our national history. Examples of hidden histories provided by Martin and Nakayama (2011) include “…the expulsion in the 1750s of many French-speaking Acadians from eastern Canada and their migration to Louisiana and the forced removal in 1838 of the Cherokees from their former nation to settlements in the state of Oklahoma, which resulted in the death of one-fifth of the Cherokee population…(pg. 72).” Another hidden history was the genocide in Rwanda between the Tutsi tribe and the Hutu, which happened between two cultures in South Africa. This was one of the bloodiest episodes in modern African history where “…the colonial overlords had sought to maintain their European hegemony by favoring the main ethnic group, the Tutsi, over the other, the Hutu…(Loeb, 2004. pg. 391)”.  These are intercultural histories that were not taught in our U.S. history classes as part of our “grand narrative”. The ignorance of such group histories causes misunderstanding and difficulty in intercultural communication.

            In my opinion, every cultural group and family has hidden history. The more we examine and listen to these histories the better equipped we are to understanding why people feel how they feel and how their communication may differ from our own. This allows us to determine what options of communication styles will be more effective when interacting with different cultural groups and individuals.

 

3.  Compare and contrast family histories with national histories.

            Many different kinds of history influences our views of and knowledge about the past, including our family histories and national histories (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). Both of these histories help us understand why our families live where they do and why we live and communicate in the ways we do. Family histories and national history overlap and influence one another.

            Family histories occur on a more personal level and are passed along orally from one generation to the next (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). Many people want to know what their ancestors experienced and what events they participated in. Many of their family histories are deeply intertwined with ethnic and religious histories.

            Nation history consists of the learning about a nation’s great events and figures. This gives us a shared notion of who we are, even if we do not personally fit into the national narrative (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). We are expected to know the particular telling of U.S. history in order to understand the many references used in communication (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). The same is true for other nations who have their own national narrative. For example; if I were to study French, it would be important for me to learn about French history to comprehend what it means to be French and how the French interact with other nations.

 

4.  How is the history of gays and lesbians relevant to intercultural communication?

            As Martin and Nakayama (2011) state, “…Interest in the history of sexuality is a fairly recent phenomenon that is beginning to challenge the ways that we think about the past (pg. 77)”. Sexual orientation histories are often overlooked, silenced, or ignored, which causes us to begin at zero in each generation in the understanding of the histories of gays and lesbians. An example of this is how many of us are not aware of the stories of the treatment of gays and lesbians during World War II, which promoted a common history and influenced intercultural communication among gays and lesbians in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and other nations (Martin & Nakayama, 2011). Many of us are not aware of how the gays and lesbians were victims of the Nazi Holocaust.

            In regards to intercultural communication, it is important to learn cultural identifiers for gays and lesbians as a way to avoid heterosexism (DeVito, 2008). DeVito (2008) presents findings from the Task Force on Bias-Free Language of the Association of American University Presses that help us identify the preferred terms for gays and lesbians that have developed through their histories. In this study, “…Homosexual refers to both gay men and lesbians, but more often merely denotes a sexual; orientation to members of a person’s own sex…(DeVito, 2008. Pg. 114)”. In order to effectively communicate with these cultures, it is important to know the preferred cultural identifiers, which include being aware of how 58 percent of homosexual women prefer the term lesbian, but 34 percent prefer gay, and gay is the preferred term to refer to a man who has an affectional preference for other men (DeVito, 2008). It is also important to realize that gay and lesbian refer to a lifestyle and not simply to sexual orientations. This lifestyle is a culture for gays and lesbians and has differences that are relevant to intercultural communication.

 

 

5.  How can we negotiate histories in interactions?

            In order to negotiate histories in interactions it is important to recognize your identities, such as a member of a racial or ethnic group, a nationality, a socioeconomic class, etc. and to realize that these identities have different meanings for other people (Martin & Nakayama, 2008). It is important to recognize that communication includes people from different histories (some known, some hidden) and that their histories play a role in their identities.

            Thill and Bovee (2009) offer some suggestions on how to negotiate histories in interactions by avoiding the negativity of ethnocentrism and the oversimplification of stereotyping. One of the suggestions is to avoid assumptions. It is important that you don’t assume others have the same values and beliefs as you and that others will act the same way you do (Thill & Bovee, 2009). Another suggestion is to avoid judgments. When people act differently, don’t conclude that their way is invalid or inferior. The third suggestion is to acknowledge distinctions. “Don’t ignore the differences between another person’s culture and your own (Thill & Bovee, 2009. pg. 75)”. The goal is to accept multiple cultures on their own terms in the form of cultural pluralism (Thill & Bovee, 2009).

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

DeVito, J. A. (2008). Messages: Building interpersonal communication skills. (6th ed).

            Boston, MA.: Allyn and Bacon.

Loeb, P. (2004). The impossible will take a little while: A citizen’s guide to hope in a time of fear.

                New York, NY.: Basic Books.

Martin, J. Nakayama, T. (2011). Experiencing intercultural communication: An introduction. (4th ed).

                New York, NY.: McGraw-Hill.

Thill, J., Bovee, C. (2009). Excellence in business communication. (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ.:

                Prentice Hall.